<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: kavips reminds me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meritboundalley.net/2008/05/11/kavips-reminds-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meritboundalley.net/2008/05/11/kavips-reminds-me/</link>
	<description>Well, that was fun!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.meritboundalley.net/2008/05/11/kavips-reminds-me/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meritboundalley.net/?p=368#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>Hey, I'm just glad you're back...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m just glad you&#8217;re back&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kavips</title>
		<link>http://www.meritboundalley.net/2008/05/11/kavips-reminds-me/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>kavips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meritboundalley.net/?p=368#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing us up to speed.....Most of this I wanted to know but lacked the time.  It was an amazing read.

As questions get answered, more questions pop up.

Could rock planets have been formed out of fractured white dwarfs instead of being coalesced out of a hot atomic mix spinning around a star?

Does that mean friction now prevents traveling faster than "warp speed..."  forcing us to resort to "jumping" to extend our horizons?

Does "space" actually exist between the strands of the cosmic web, or is space-time confined only to the strands themselves?

Does the reflection of reptilian genes within the mammal platypus, have any correlation to such transfer of genetic material from dinosaurs to mammalian society as we know it now?  

Would that make the Platypus a direct link instead of a byproduct of odd evolution......

Wish I had more time.   Thanks for doing this.  It is a much valued service.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing us up to speed&#8230;..Most of this I wanted to know but lacked the time.  It was an amazing read.</p>
<p>As questions get answered, more questions pop up.</p>
<p>Could rock planets have been formed out of fractured white dwarfs instead of being coalesced out of a hot atomic mix spinning around a star?</p>
<p>Does that mean friction now prevents traveling faster than &#8220;warp speed&#8230;&#8221;  forcing us to resort to &#8220;jumping&#8221; to extend our horizons?</p>
<p>Does &#8220;space&#8221; actually exist between the strands of the cosmic web, or is space-time confined only to the strands themselves?</p>
<p>Does the reflection of reptilian genes within the mammal platypus, have any correlation to such transfer of genetic material from dinosaurs to mammalian society as we know it now?  </p>
<p>Would that make the Platypus a direct link instead of a byproduct of odd evolution&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Wish I had more time.   Thanks for doing this.  It is a much valued service&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe M</title>
		<link>http://www.meritboundalley.net/2008/05/11/kavips-reminds-me/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meritboundalley.net/?p=368#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>Forrest,

I guess "viewed" was a bad choice of words, and I will change that. However, &lt;a href="http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2007/17/full/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Hubble has detected a ring of dark matter around a star cluster&lt;/a&gt; which is pretty close to imaging it but not close enough to use "viewed", and more recently, a team of Italian scientists may have &lt;a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2008/04/21/dark-matter-detected/"  rel="nofollow"&gt;directly detected dark matter particles&lt;/a&gt; by watching for a modulation in the quantity of times that the earth has collided with dark matter. The modulation was thought and confirmed by the data to be caused by the earth hitting more dark matter particles when the earth and the solar system velocities were pointed in the same direction. I can't wait to see this one duplicated!

Thanks for pointing out the error!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forrest,</p>
<p>I guess &#8220;viewed&#8221; was a bad choice of words, and I will change that. However, <a href="http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2007/17/full/" rel="nofollow">Hubble has detected a ring of dark matter around a star cluster</a> which is pretty close to imaging it but not close enough to use &#8220;viewed&#8221;, and more recently, a team of Italian scientists may have <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2008/04/21/dark-matter-detected/"  rel="nofollow">directly detected dark matter particles</a> by watching for a modulation in the quantity of times that the earth has collided with dark matter. The modulation was thought and confirmed by the data to be caused by the earth hitting more dark matter particles when the earth and the solar system velocities were pointed in the same direction. I can&#8217;t wait to see this one duplicated!</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out the error!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forrest noble</title>
		<link>http://www.meritboundalley.net/2008/05/11/kavips-reminds-me/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>forrest noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meritboundalley.net/?p=368#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>Joe M,

This is all BB interpretation of the data. 5% of the matter is atomic matter, OK. Real dark matter can never been "seen". It's omnipresent. To see dark matter it loses its definition. Still 95% of the real dark matter remains. Evidence for it, other than motions of galaxies, can be seen in the lab in a form which we currently call quark jets. In reality they are the primary particles within quark jets.

your friend forrest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe M,</p>
<p>This is all BB interpretation of the data. 5% of the matter is atomic matter, OK. Real dark matter can never been &#8220;seen&#8221;. It&#8217;s omnipresent. To see dark matter it loses its definition. Still 95% of the real dark matter remains. Evidence for it, other than motions of galaxies, can be seen in the lab in a form which we currently call quark jets. In reality they are the primary particles within quark jets.</p>
<p>your friend forrest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
